Picture 1.
Some spreads from my finalised thesis book.
|
This
article is a designer’s point of view from the Cruise and Ferry program’s
Triad-project introduced by Yali Wu some weeks ago in this blog.
Modularity
and adjustability seem to be hot topics in contemporary manufacturing world. Whether
it is about car design, housing industry or even shipbuilding investors want to
see their investment to meet the changing needs and wants of the customers.
When talking about such a great investment as a cruise ship, the fast
adjustability to changing preferences is of a great importance. I had a chance,
as a designer, to play with the thought of having this kind of new modular cruise
ship in contemporary environment and imagine the way it could be used and by
whom.
When
talking about change and adjustability the first big question is the timeframe.
The terms “fast” and “slow” are very relative when it comes to cruise industry
and depend on the perspective; from the marine architecture point of view
general change in shipbuilding might take several years before accepted but
from interior design’s point of view change has to be done in days – the more
the ship is out of service the more expensive the change will be. It goes
without saying that the scale of change in these two points of view is
completely different and reflects the timeframe we are talking about.
Picture 2. Different options for frequency of changing the modules. These options were shown to the interviewees to choose the most suitable one for the final scenario. |
My research
started from understanding the need for change and defining boundaries for it.
By interviewing several professionals in the marine industry from shipyards,
shipping companies, modular cabin element company, shipping container company
and, as a wild card, exhibition centre I gained an understanding of the variety
of changes that could be possible and at the same time the most preferred
timeframe for change. At the same time I heard the professionals’ opinion for
how long the change of one macro module would be.
Picture 3.
To understand the system and structure of the new vessel it was necessary to
model it in 3D and test how the modules with different functions could be
allocated.
|
This
operation helped me to sketch out a scenario for how the operation of this kind
of new cruise ship could look like, who would be involved in the process and
how the new innovation is linked to the real cruise industry of today. The main
objective for the whole research was to show to the different actors of the
cruise industry that the interchangeable macro module innovation could work
even today making it possible for them to decide if they are interested in continuing
further the research and development of the innovation.
Picture 4. The change structure break down diagram shows all the actors involved in the operation of the new cruise ships and their actions during the different stages of the cruise ship’s journey. |
Eventually
the research became the basis for my master’s thesis that can be found Aalto
University’s internet page as well as from my blog: vesay.wordpress.com.
VESA YLIRISKU
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti